It was really the wisest decision- Ukraine rejected joining the EU after all. Who, in his right mind, would want to join a group which is so highly-indebted it is imploding in the first place? Ukraine immediately set its sights on restrengthening its relationship with Russia. Russia, after only 20 years of capitalism and without massive printing of money like what the Central Banks of the floundering "developed" Western countries are busily doing, is already the richest country in Europe by GDP-PPP: $3.4 trillion vs. Germany's $3.3 trillion, and it will form the locus of the big landmass (Russia-China-Central Asia) which is the future economic center of the world (adjacent countries in East Asia really has no alternative but to recognize the generator of the greatest wealth- is the Philippines even aware of this geopolitical play?). I find the whole episode actually funny- after the debacle in Hungary, Romania, and some others who didn't exactly progress despite their high expectations on their membership, some still had the stupidity to be hoodwinked by delusion artists. Well, this is just confirming the obvious course of events... the steady dawning of the Asian Century.
NB (November 23, 2013)
For the record: Prime Minister Mykola Azarov of
Ukraine said requirements of the International Monetary Fund were "the
last straw"
that pushed the Ukrainian government to reviving negotiations with
Russia instead
of the EU, writes
Ukrainska Pravda.
According
to Azarov, the IMF demanded that Ukraine, a country in near debt
default, increase utility prices and stop increasing social help
payments to pay its debts. (The article is in Cyrillic, just use a
Translator). The Western Europeans were under the impression the
supposedly lesser ones will only be"too excited" that they will gladly
forget reason, conscience and self-respect just to belong to their
"exalted" group. But how can one with tattered clothes be "exalted"
enough to sweet talk even the most stupid sucker if it's obvious he
himself doesn't have the money to buy a new dress? It really gets
comical here. It just becomes obvious... the lessening leverage of the
hackneyed tactics of a fading era.
As expected, the Western mainstream press was again used to spread the disinformation that it was Russia which pressured Ukraine.
Typical role of Western mainstream press: shield the bankers and let everybody talk of anything else EXCEPT the REAL reason.
If you are quick, you can also see here who the Western mainstream press is really working for.
The article was from RT.
‘Future of Western Europe and Ukraine lies in Eurasia’
William Engdahl
The EU ‘horror show’ would not have offered Ukraine any financial
benefits, geopolitical analyst William Engdahl told RT. He argues that
multinational corporations just want to use Kiev to extract the
resources of yet another European country.
RT: Ukraine's decision came as a surprise for many.
What triggered it?
William Engdahl: I think it’s a combination of things but
ultimately it was economic pressure from Moscow. I think that had
a lot to do with their decision where Ukrainian economic
interests truly lie. And perhaps some of the Ukrainian business
elites looked more closely at what the EU trade agreements would
require of them to sacrifice and realized that it wasn’t the
dream boat that they perhaps hoped for.
RT: Will they be able to strike a balance between
Moscow and Brussels?
WE: I think if they are clever, I suspect that the Ukrainian
political leadership has a delusional view of what the EU would
bring for the Ukrainian economy. Of course they long to be
accepted as a Western European nation, and so forth, since the
breakup of the Soviet Union but right now the EU is in a kind of
a death spiral with the false construct of the Eurozone. And the
austerity package that the IMF is bringing to the periphery –
Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy and so forth – that is a
horrendous thing.
The EU has little now to offer Ukraine and if Ukrainian business,
political leaders were looking at the thing more realistically,
they would concentrate on building stronger bridges to the East.
Because the future of Europe, of Western Europe, not simply
Ukraine, the future of Western Europe in my view lies in Eurasia
in a sense of Russia, China, the Middle Eastern countries,
especially Iran.
RT: But nonetheless a lot of Ukrainians have the
aspirations to be part of the EU?
WE: Well delusions are in every society. What can I say?
You have a delusion that life would be better in the EU. Talk to
Polish people, talk to Hungarians, talk to many of the countries
who joined the EU, maybe even joined the Euro and realized it was
a horror show. It destroyed their domestic industry. The EU is a
construct of global multinationals and those global
multinationals want to cherry-pick what is useful out of the
Ukranian economy which has precious resources.
RT: Let’s talk about the main political tension at the
moment and Yuliya Tymoshenko. Some members of the parliament say
she could be freed to get medical treatment. What is her future
then?
WE: She is a very complex case, but I think she has been
made into a symbol, into a straw woman for Western and especially
the US State Department pressure on Ukraine to make concessions
towards the West and towards NATO. And at this point Ukraine has
rethought the entire NATO option the previous presidency was so
keen on and realized that it would not be the most sensible thing
for Ukraine and I agree with that.
But I think Yulia Tymoshenko became a symbol and it had little to
do with her actual activities. Her corruption with the gas deal
she made when she was in office is well documented. She was tied
in with mafia elements that made billions at the expense of
Ukrainians and also the Russians. I think she was made a symbol
for another agenda and that is to put pressure on Ukraine to make
concessions towards the West.
William Engdahl is an award-winning geopolitical analyst and strategic
risk consultant whose internationally best-selling books have been
translated into thirteen foreign languages.